YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Setting Maximum Incentive for Incentive/Disincentive Contracts for Highway Projects

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Jin-Fang Shr
    ,
    Wei Tong Chen
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(84)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: An increasing number of State Highway Agencies (SHAs) are utilizing Incentive/Disincentive (I/D) bidding for highway construction. The I/D bidding concept is designed to shorten the total contract time by giving the contractor an incentive for early completion and a disincentive for late completion of a project. SHAs are then presented with the problem of determining the maximum incentive that may be awarded to the contractor. This maximum incentive amount is affected by construction cost, time, and the incentive/disincentive formula. Many SHAs use a fixed amount or fixed percent of construction cost as a maximum incentive amount. However, overestimation of the maximum incentive amount may waste public money and underestimation will reduce the effectiveness of the incentive. This research offers a quantifying model to determine a reasonable maximum incentive amount and uses projects from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to illustrate this model that is only suitable for linear I/D. A functional relationship between the construction cost and time duration is developed from the FDOT’s data. The curve with the functional relationship between the construction cost and time duration is then combined with the incentive/disincentive line to determine the optimum maximum days for incentive and incentive amount. Finally, several projects completed by the FDOT will be used to illustrate the validity of this model.
    • Download: (121.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Setting Maximum Incentive for Incentive/Disincentive Contracts for Highway Projects

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/21732
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJin-Fang Shr
    contributor authorWei Tong Chen
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:37:49Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:37:49Z
    date copyrightFebruary 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282004%29130%3A1%2884%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/21732
    description abstractAn increasing number of State Highway Agencies (SHAs) are utilizing Incentive/Disincentive (I/D) bidding for highway construction. The I/D bidding concept is designed to shorten the total contract time by giving the contractor an incentive for early completion and a disincentive for late completion of a project. SHAs are then presented with the problem of determining the maximum incentive that may be awarded to the contractor. This maximum incentive amount is affected by construction cost, time, and the incentive/disincentive formula. Many SHAs use a fixed amount or fixed percent of construction cost as a maximum incentive amount. However, overestimation of the maximum incentive amount may waste public money and underestimation will reduce the effectiveness of the incentive. This research offers a quantifying model to determine a reasonable maximum incentive amount and uses projects from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to illustrate this model that is only suitable for linear I/D. A functional relationship between the construction cost and time duration is developed from the FDOT’s data. The curve with the functional relationship between the construction cost and time duration is then combined with the incentive/disincentive line to determine the optimum maximum days for incentive and incentive amount. Finally, several projects completed by the FDOT will be used to illustrate the validity of this model.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSetting Maximum Incentive for Incentive/Disincentive Contracts for Highway Projects
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(84)
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian