YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Rock Correction Methods for Compaction of Clayey Soils

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Sandra L. Houston
    ,
    Kenneth D. Walsh
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:4(763)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The effect of varying percentages of large aggregate on the maximum dry density and optimum water content of clay is investigated through a series of laboratory compaction tests. Rock content (material retained on the No. 4 sieve) was varied from 0% to about 60% in the laboratory tests. The compaction tests are performed primarily using ASTM D698 method D, with replacement for oversized aggregate, i.e., the “scalp‐and‐replace” method. The maximum dry density obtained from ASTM D698 method D is compared with the maximum dry density estimated from rock correction equations in ASTM method 4718, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation method 5515‐89, and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials procedure T224. The optimum water content obtained from ASTM D698 method D is compared to the estimated optimum water content obtained from rock correction equations in ASTM method 4718. The data presented in this paper show that when soil fines are clayey, very significant differences in maximum dry density are obtained using scalp‐and‐replace procedures compared with the rock correction equations. The potential impact of these differences on construction compaction control are addressed.
    • Download: (832.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Rock Correction Methods for Compaction of Clayey Soils

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/21257
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSandra L. Houston
    contributor authorKenneth D. Walsh
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:36:55Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:36:55Z
    date copyrightApril 1993
    date issued1993
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281993%29119%3A4%28763%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/21257
    description abstractThe effect of varying percentages of large aggregate on the maximum dry density and optimum water content of clay is investigated through a series of laboratory compaction tests. Rock content (material retained on the No. 4 sieve) was varied from 0% to about 60% in the laboratory tests. The compaction tests are performed primarily using ASTM D698 method D, with replacement for oversized aggregate, i.e., the “scalp‐and‐replace” method. The maximum dry density obtained from ASTM D698 method D is compared with the maximum dry density estimated from rock correction equations in ASTM method 4718, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation method 5515‐89, and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials procedure T224. The optimum water content obtained from ASTM D698 method D is compared to the estimated optimum water content obtained from rock correction equations in ASTM method 4718. The data presented in this paper show that when soil fines are clayey, very significant differences in maximum dry density are obtained using scalp‐and‐replace procedures compared with the rock correction equations. The potential impact of these differences on construction compaction control are addressed.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleComparison of Rock Correction Methods for Compaction of Clayey Soils
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume119
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:4(763)
    treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian