contributor author | Kris G. Mattila | |
contributor author | Amy Park | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:35:42Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T20:35:42Z | |
date copyright | February 2003 | |
date issued | 2003 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290733-9364%282003%29129%3A1%2856%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20632 | |
description abstract | Various linear scheduling techniques have been proposed over the years. The limitations on these techniques have been the inability to determine critical activities. Contractors and departments of transportation have identified this need. Recently two different methods have been proposed—the linear scheduling model and the repetitive scheduling method. This paper discusses basic linear scheduling techniques and then the calculation of critical activities of basic linear scheduling elements using the two methods. The results of the two techniques are compared. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Comparison of Linear Scheduling Model and Repetitive Scheduling Method | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 129 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:1(56) | |
tree | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2003:;Volume ( 129 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |