| contributor author | William F. Anderson | |
| contributor author | Ian C. Pyrah | |
| contributor author | Faisal Haji Ali | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:34:28Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:34:28Z | |
| date copyright | November 1987 | |
| date issued | 1987 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9410%281987%29113%3A11%281344%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20011 | |
| description abstract | The response of soil loaded in a pressuremeter test is inherently time‐dependent; even for an “undrained” test in a clay, some consolidation will occur. The pressuremeter expansion will also be affected by creep of the soil skeleton, and thus both the results and the derived parameters will be influenced by the testing technique adopted. To examine the influence of time, the problem has been examined both experimentally and numerically. Pressuremeter tests have been simulated in the laboratory by expanding cylindrical cavities using different incremental pressure techniques in three types of clay prepared with known stress history, and the results compared with finite‐element predictions. The finite‐element program is based on critical‐state soil mechanics and includes both consolidation and deviatoric creep. This has given a new insight into the behavior of clays during pressuremeter tests. The results indicate that any simple standardization of pressuremeter test technique should be approached with caution. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Rate Effects in Pressuremeter Tests in Clays | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 113 | |
| journal issue | 11 | |
| journal title | Journal of Geotechnical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:11(1344) | |
| tree | Journal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 011 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |