YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Dynamic Response of Arbitrarily Shaped Foundations: Experimental Verification

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Ricardo Dobry
    ,
    George Gazetas
    ,
    Kenneth H. Stokoe, II
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:2(136)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Results of twenty‐one free vibration tests on surface model footings on moist sand having different base shapes and about equal base area have been reported by Stokoe and Erden (5,8). These tests are used here to verify the analytical method of the companion paper (3), for circular, square and rectangular base shapes with aspect ratios up to 6, and including vertical, torsional and coupled swaying‐rocking oscillations. Close agreement is found between predicted and measured frequencies in all cases, and also between damping ratios in vertical and torsional vibration. The experiments provide strong support for the vertical and torsional radiation damping graphs developed in Ref. 3, including verification of the increased damping ratios predicted for the longest footings. The accord is also reasonably good for damping in those swayingrocking tests in which rocking and material damping are dominant and the overall damping ratio is about 3%. However, the method of Ref. 3 overpredicts the measured swaying‐rocking damping ratios in those tests in which swaying and radiation damping are also important, and for which larger damping ratios are predicted (4% to 9%). This discrepancy between half‐space predicted swaying‐rocking damping and measured values is explained by the effect of boundary wave reflections on the test results.
    • Download: (1.005Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Dynamic Response of Arbitrarily Shaped Foundations: Experimental Verification

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/19858
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRicardo Dobry
    contributor authorGeorge Gazetas
    contributor authorKenneth H. Stokoe, II
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:34:12Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:34:12Z
    date copyrightFebruary 1986
    date issued1986
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281986%29112%3A2%28136%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/19858
    description abstractResults of twenty‐one free vibration tests on surface model footings on moist sand having different base shapes and about equal base area have been reported by Stokoe and Erden (5,8). These tests are used here to verify the analytical method of the companion paper (3), for circular, square and rectangular base shapes with aspect ratios up to 6, and including vertical, torsional and coupled swaying‐rocking oscillations. Close agreement is found between predicted and measured frequencies in all cases, and also between damping ratios in vertical and torsional vibration. The experiments provide strong support for the vertical and torsional radiation damping graphs developed in Ref. 3, including verification of the increased damping ratios predicted for the longest footings. The accord is also reasonably good for damping in those swayingrocking tests in which rocking and material damping are dominant and the overall damping ratio is about 3%. However, the method of Ref. 3 overpredicts the measured swaying‐rocking damping ratios in those tests in which swaying and radiation damping are also important, and for which larger damping ratios are predicted (4% to 9%). This discrepancy between half‐space predicted swaying‐rocking damping and measured values is explained by the effect of boundary wave reflections on the test results.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDynamic Response of Arbitrarily Shaped Foundations: Experimental Verification
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume112
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:2(136)
    treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian