Show simple item record

contributor authorLi, Shiou
contributor authorLee, Jiyeon
contributor authorHan, Je
contributor authorZhang, Luzeng
contributor authorMoon, Hee
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:34:16Z
date available2017-05-09T01:34:16Z
date issued2016
identifier issn0889-504X
identifier otherturbo_138_08_081004.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/162795
description abstractThis paper presents the swirl purge flow on a platform and a modeled landbased turbine rotor blade suction surface. Pressuresensitive paint (PSP) mass transfer technique provides detailed filmcooling effectiveness distribution on the platform and phantom cooling effectiveness on the blade suction surface. Experiments were conducted in a lowspeed wind tunnel facility with a fiveblade linear cascade. The inlet Reynolds number based on the chord length is 250,000. Swirl purge flow is simulated by coolant injection through 50 inclined cylindrical holes ahead of the blade leading edge row. Coolant injections from cylindrical holes pass through nozzle endwall and a dolphin nose axisymmetric contour before reaching the platform and blade suction surface. Different “coolant injection anglesâ€‌ and “coolant injection velocity to cascade inlet velocityâ€‌ result in various swirl ratios to simulate real engine conditions. Simulated swirl purge flow uses coolant injection angles of 30 deg, 45 deg, and 60 deg to produce swirl ratios of 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8, respectively. Traditional purge flow has a coolant injection angle of 90 deg to generate swirl ratio of 1. Coolant to mainstream mass flow rate (MFR) ratio is 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% for all the swirl ratios. Coolant to mainstream density ratio maintains at 1.5 to match engine conditions. Most of the swirl purge and purge coolant approach the platform; however, a small amount of the coolant migrates to the blade suction surface. Swirl ratio of 0.4 has the highest relative motion between rotor and coolant and severely decreases film cooling and phantom cooling effectiveness. Higher MFR of 1% and 1.5% cases suffers from apparent decrement of the effectiveness while increasing relative motion.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleTurbine Platform Cooling and Blade Suction Surface Phantom Cooling From Simulated Swirl Purge Flow
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
identifier doi10.1115/1.4032676
journal fristpage81004
journal lastpage81004
identifier eissn1528-8900
treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record