Show simple item record

contributor authorLing, Julia
contributor authorRyan, Kevin J.
contributor authorBodart, Julien
contributor authorEaton, John K.
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:33:59Z
date available2017-05-09T01:33:59Z
date issued2016
identifier issn0889-504X
identifier otherturbo_138_01_011006.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/162730
description abstractAlgebraic closures for the turbulent scalar fluxes were evaluated for a discrete hole film cooling geometry using the results from a highfidelity large eddy simulation (LES). Several models for the turbulent scalar fluxes exist, including the widely used gradient diffusion hypothesis (GDH), the generalized GDH (GGDH), and the higherorder GDH (HOGGDH). By analyzing the results from the LES, it was possible to isolate the error due to these turbulent mixing models. Distributions of the turbulent diffusivity, turbulent viscosity, and turbulent Prandtl number were extracted from the LES results. It was shown that the turbulent Prandtl number varies significantly spatially, undermining the applicability of the Reynolds analogy for this flow. The LES velocity field and Reynolds stresses were fed into a Reynoldsaveraged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver to calculate the fluid temperature distribution. This analysis revealed in which regions of the flow various modeling assumptions were invalid and what effect those assumptions had on the predicted temperature distribution.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAnalysis of Turbulent Scalar Flux Models for a Discrete Hole Film Cooling Flow
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
identifier doi10.1115/1.4031698
journal fristpage11006
journal lastpage11006
identifier eissn1528-8900
treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record