Show simple item record

contributor authorY. Suezawa
contributor authorM. Matsumura
contributor authorM. Nakajima
contributor authorK. Tsuda
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:31:05Z
date available2017-05-09T01:31:05Z
date copyrightSeptember, 1972
date issued1972
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherJFEGA4-27397#521_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161822
description abstractCavitation damage tests of iron and steel have been carried out using two types of experimental facilities. One is a water tunnel system which presumably simulates the field conditions fairly closely and the other is a magnetostriction vibratory unit commonly used for accelerated cavitation erosion testing of metals. A comparison between water tunnel and vibratory tests shows a difference in mechanism of cavitation damage. Consequently, it has been concluded that the application of the test results obtained in a magnetostriction vibratory apparatus should be limited to provide rough data for the primary selection of proper materials to be used in the construction of hydraulic units and other industrial systems, unless damage is caused under similar conditions to that of the vibratory apparatus.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleStudies on Cavitation Erosion
typeJournal Paper
journal volume94
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.3425471
journal fristpage521
journal lastpage531
identifier eissn1528-901X
keywordsCavitation erosion
keywordsCavitation
keywordsWater tunnels
keywordsMagnetostriction
keywordsTesting
keywordsIron
keywordsMechanisms
keywordsMetals
keywordsSteel
keywordsSurface roughness AND Construction
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1972:;volume( 094 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record