Show simple item record

contributor authorParedes, Manuel
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:30:51Z
date available2017-05-09T01:30:51Z
date issued2016
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier othermd_138_02_021404.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161749
description abstractCylindrical compression springs have been commonly exploited in mechanical systems for years and their behavior is considered as well identified. Nevertheless, it appears that, even though old research studies suggest correcting the rate formula, the main industrial software dedicated to spring design exploits the uncorrected one. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the analytical formulae for spring behavior, an experimental study was performed, which tried to cover the common design space. This study was done using the two common coil ends: closed and ground ends, and closed and not ground ends. Moreover, the accuracy of the load–length relation was investigated whereas older studies focused only on the spring rate. It appears that the common uncorrected formulae give satisfactory results only when large numbers of coils are involved. We also highlight, for the first time, that it is interesting to correct not only the spring rate but also the free length of the spring.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleEnhanced Formulae for Determining Both Free Length and Rate of Cylindrical Compression Springs
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4032094
journal fristpage21404
journal lastpage21404
identifier eissn1528-9001
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record