Show simple item record

contributor authorKأ¶nigseder, Corinna
contributor authorShea, Kristina
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:30:47Z
date available2017-05-09T01:30:47Z
date issued2016
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier othermd_138_01_011102.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161728
description abstractGraph grammars are used for computational design synthesis (CDS) in which engineering knowledge is formalized using graphs to represent designs and rules that describe their transformation. Most engineering tasks require both topologic and parametric rules to generate designs. The research presented in this paper compares different strategies for rule application to combine topologic and parametric rules during automated design synthesis driven by a search process. The presented strategies are compared considering quantity and quality of the generated designs. The effect of the strategies, the selected search algorithm, and the initial design, from which the synthesis is started, are analyzed for two case studies: gearbox synthesis and bicycle frame synthesis. Results show that the effect of the strategy is dependent on the design task. Recommendations are given on which strategies to use for which design task.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparing Strategies for Topologic and Parametric Rule Application in Automated Computational Design Synthesis1
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4031714
journal fristpage11102
journal lastpage11102
identifier eissn1528-9001
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record