Show simple item record

contributor authorZhou, Ye
contributor authorThornber, Ben
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:29:38Z
date available2017-05-09T01:29:38Z
date issued2016
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherfe_138_07_070905.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161383
description abstractThe implicit largeeddy simulation (ILES) has been utilized as an effective approach for calculating many complex flows at high Reynolds number flows. Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI) induced flow can be viewed as a homogeneous decaying turbulence (HDT) after the passage of the shock. In this article, a critical evaluation of three methods for estimating the effective Reynolds number and the effective kinematic viscosity is undertaken utilizing highresolution ILES data. Effective Reynolds numbers based on the vorticity and dissipation rate, or the integral and innerviscous length scales, are found to be the most selfconsistent when compared to the expected phenomenology and wind tunnel experiments.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleA Comparison of Three Approaches to Compute the Effective Reynolds Number of the Implicit Large Eddy Simulations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4032532
journal fristpage70905
journal lastpage70905
identifier eissn1528-901X
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record