Show simple item record

contributor authorParker, Robert R.
contributor authorGalvan, Edgar
contributor authorMalak, Richard J.
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:10:38Z
date available2017-05-09T01:10:38Z
date issued2014
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier othermd_136_07_071003.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/155668
description abstractPrior research suggests that setbased design representations can be useful for facilitating collaboration among engineers in a design project. However, existing setbased methods are limited in terms of how the sets are constructed and in their representational capability. The focus of this article is on the problem of modeling the capabilities of a component technology in a way that can be communicated and used in support of systemlevel decision making. The context is the system definition phases of a systems engineering project, when engineers still are considering various technical concepts. The approach under investigation requires engineers familiar with the componentor subsystemlevel technologies to generate a setbased model of their achievable technical attributes, called a technology characterization model (TCM). Systems engineers then use these models to explore systemlevel alternatives and choose the combination of technologies that are best suited to the design problem. Previously, this approach was shown to be theoretically sound from a decision making perspective under idealized circumstances. This article is an investigation into the practical effectiveness of different TCM representational methods under realistic conditions such as having limited data. A power plant systems engineering problem is used as an example, with TCMs generated for different technical concepts for the condenser component. Samples of valid condenser realizations are used as inputs to the TCM representation methods. Two TCM representation methods are compared based on their solution accuracy and computational effort required: a Krigingbased interpolation and a machine learning technique called support vector domain description (SVDD). The results from this example hold that the SVDDbased method provides the better combination of accuracy and efficiency.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleTechnology Characterization Models and Their Use in Systems Design
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4025960
journal fristpage71003
journal lastpage71003
identifier eissn1528-9001
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record