| contributor author | Chen, Qun | |
| contributor author | Guo, Zeng | |
| contributor author | Liang, Xin | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:09:40Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:09:40Z | |
| date issued | 2014 | |
| identifier issn | 0022-1481 | |
| identifier other | ht_136_09_096001.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/155374 | |
| description abstract | Awad [1], as well as Bejan [3] cited Grazzini et al.'s paper [2] several times as a proof that “entransy analyses do not provide new results relative to what is already available based on established methods (exergy destruction, entropy generation, and constructal law).†Hence, we have to point out briefly the misreadings and incorrect citations of the entransyrelated papers by Grazzini et al. that may result in misunderstanding of our papers. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Closure to “Discussion of â€کEntransy is Now Clear’†(2014, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 136(9), p. 095502) | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 136 | |
| journal issue | 9 | |
| journal title | Journal of Heat Transfer | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4027822 | |
| journal fristpage | 96001 | |
| journal lastpage | 96001 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8943 | |
| tree | Journal of Heat Transfer:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 009 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
