Show simple item record

contributor authorLigrani, Phil
contributor authorGoodro, Matt
contributor authorFox, Mike
contributor authorMoon, Hee
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:59:33Z
date available2017-05-09T00:59:33Z
date issued2013
identifier issn0022-1481
identifier otherht_135_3_031707.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/152038
description abstractExperimental results are presented for a fullcoverage film cooling arrangement which simulates a portion of a gas turbine engine, with appropriate streamwise static pressure gradient. The test surface utilizes varying blowing ratio (BR) along the length of the contraction passage which contains the cooling hole arrangement. For the different experimental conditions examined, film cooling holes are sharpedged and streamwise inclined either at 20 deg or 30 deg with respect to the liner surface. The film cooling holes in adjacent streamwise rows are staggered with respect to each other. Data are provided for turbulent film cooling, contraction ratios of 1, 3, 4, and 5, blowing ratios (at the test section entrance) of 2.0, 5.0, and 10.0, coolant Reynolds numbers Refc of 10,000–12,000, freestream temperatures from 75 آ°C to 115 آ°C, a film hole diameter of 7 mm, and density ratios from 1.15 to 1.25. Nondimensional streamwise and spanwise film cooling hole spacings, X/D and Y/D, are 6, and 5, respectively. When the streamwise hole inclination angle is 20 deg spatially averaged and lineaveraged adiabatic effectiveness values at each x/D location are about the same as the contraction ratio varies between 1, 3, and 4, with slightly higher values at each x/D location when the contraction ratio Cr is 5. For each contraction ratio, there is a slight increase in effectiveness when the blowing ratio is increased from 2.0 to 5.0 but there is no further substantial improvement when the blowing ratio is increased to 10.0. Overall, lineaveraged and spatially averagedadiabatic film effectiveness data, and spatially averaged heat transfer coefficient data are described as they are affected by contraction ratio, blowing ratio, hole angle خ±, and streamwise location x/D. For example, when خ±â€‰= 20 deg, the detrimental effects of mainstream acceleration are apparent since heat transfer coefficients for contraction ratios Cr of 3 and 5 are often higher than values for Cr = 1, especially for x/D > 100.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleFull Coverage Film Cooling: Film Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficients for Dense Hole Arrays at Different Hole Angles, Contraction Ratios, and Blowing Ratios
typeJournal Paper
journal volume135
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Heat Transfer
identifier doi10.1115/1.4007981
journal fristpage31707
journal lastpage31707
identifier eissn1528-8943
treeJournal of Heat Transfer:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record