Show simple item record

contributor authorPhilip Prygoski, Matthew
contributor authorSanchez Caballero, Samuel
contributor authorSchmid, Steven R.
contributor authorLozier, Antony J.
contributor authorSelles, Miguel Angel
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:56:46Z
date available2017-05-09T00:56:46Z
date issued2013
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherbio_135_09_091008.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/151088
description abstractA new method of bone fracture fixation has been developed in which fixation darts (small diameter nails/pins) are driven across a fracture site at high velocity with a pneumatically powered gun. When fixation darts are inserted oblique to one another, kinematic constraints prevent fragment motion and allow bone healing to progress. The primary aim of this study is to determine if fixation darts can provide reasonable fixation stability compared to bone screws, which were used as a benchmark since they represent a simple, yet wellestablished, surgical technique. The first objective was to evaluate macrolevel stability using different numbers of darts inserted parallel and oblique to each other; experimental comparisons were undertaken in a bone analog model. Experimental results showed fixation darts could not be substituted for screws on a onetoone basis, but that a plurality of fixation darts provided comparable fixation to two bone screws while allowing for faster insertion and damaging less bone. A second objective was to evaluate microlevel stability; a finite element model was created in order to provide a detailed look at the stress state surrounding the fixation darts and the evolution of the fracture gap. Even with relatively weak fixation dart configurations, the fracture gap was maintained below physiological thresholds for bone healing. Most failures of the fixed fractures were attributed to fixation dart pullout from the cancellous structure. The final objective of the study was to characterize this mode of failure with separate fixation dart and screw pullout tests conducted in Sawbonesآ® cancellous foam and fresh porcine cancellous bone. The results showed that the cancellous foam was an acceptable substitute for real bone and provided a conservative estimate of the fixation darts' performance relative to bone screws. A final comparison between experimental and numerically predicted pullout strengths provided confirmation that the model and experiments were consistent.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleHigh Speed Fracture Fixation: Assessing Resulting Fixation Stability and Fastener Withdrawal Strength
typeJournal Paper
journal volume135
journal issue9
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4024641
journal fristpage91008
journal lastpage91008
identifier eissn1528-8951
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 009
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record