Show simple item record

contributor authorP. Schuepbach
contributor authorM. G. Rose
contributor authorJ. Gier
contributor authorR. S. Abhari
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:47:27Z
date available2017-05-09T00:47:27Z
date copyrightApril, 2011
date issued2011
identifier issn0889-504X
identifier otherJOTUEI-28770#021011_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/147829
description abstractNonaxisymmetric endwall profiling is a promising method to reduce secondary losses in axial turbines. However, in high-pressure turbines, a small amount of air is ejected at the hub rim seal to prevent the ingestion of hot gases into the cavity between the stator and the rotor disk. This rim seal purge flow has a strong influence on the development of the hub secondary flow structures. This paper presents time-resolved experimental and computational data for a one-and-1/2-stage high work axial turbine, showing the influence of purge flow on the performance of two different nonaxisymmetric endwalls and the axisymmetric baseline case. The experimental total-to-total efficiency assessment reveals that the nonaxisymmetric endwalls lose some of their benefit relative to the baseline case when purge is increased. The first endwall design loses 50% of the efficiency improvement seen with low suction, while the second endwall design exhibits a 34% deterioration. The time-resolved computations show that the rotor dominates the static pressure field at the rim seal exit when purge flow is present. Therefore, the purge flow establishes itself as jets emerging at the blade suction side corner. The jet strength is modulated by the first vane pressure field. The jets introduce circumferential vorticity as they enter the annulus. As the injected fluid is turned around the rotor leading edge, a streamwise vortex component is created. The dominating leakage vortex has the same sense of rotation as the rotor hub passage vortex. The first endwall design causes the strongest circumferential variation in the rim seal exit static pressure field. Therefore, the jets are stronger with this geometry and introduce more vorticity than the other two cases. As a consequence the experimental data at the rotor exit shows the greatest unsteadiness within the rotor hub passage with the first endwall design.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleInfluence of Rim Seal Purge Flow on the Performance of an Endwall-Profiled Axial Turbine
typeJournal Paper
journal volume133
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
identifier doi10.1115/1.4000578
journal fristpage21011
identifier eissn1528-8900
keywordsDesign
keywordsRotors
keywordsTurbines
keywordsPressure
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsVortices
keywordsBlades AND Suction
treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record