Show simple item record

contributor authorSara Behdad
contributor authorMinjung Kwak
contributor authorHarrison Kim
contributor authorDeborah Thurston
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:39:39Z
date available2017-05-09T00:39:39Z
date copyrightApril, 2010
date issued2010
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier otherJMDEDB-27921#041002_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/144233
description abstractEnvironmental protection legislation, consumer interest in “green” products, a trend toward corporate responsibility and recognition of the potential profitability of salvaging operations, has resulted in increased interest in product take back. However, the cost effectiveness of product take-back operations is hampered by many factors, including the high cost of disassembly and a widely varying feedstock of dissimilar products. Two types of decisions must be made, how to carry out the disassembly process in the most efficient manner to “mine” the value-added that is still embedded in the product, and then how to best utilize that value-added once it is recovered. This paper presents a method for making those decisions. The concept of a transition matrix is integrated with mixed integer linear programming to determine the extent to which products should be disassembled and simultaneously determine the optimal end-of-life (EOL) strategy for each resultant component or subassembly. The main contribution of this paper is the simultaneous consideration of selective disassembly, multiple products, and the value added that remains in each component or subassembly. Shared disassembly operations and capacity limits are considered. An example using two cell phone products illustrates application of the model. The obtained results demonstrate the most economical level of disassembly for each cell phone and the best EOL options for each resultant module. In addition, the cell phone example shows that sharing disassembly operations between different products makes disassembly more cost effective compared with the case in which each product is disassembled separately.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleSimultaneous Selective Disassembly and End-of-Life Decision Making for Multiple Products That Share Disassembly Operations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4001207
journal fristpage41002
identifier eissn1528-9001
keywordsSurgery
keywordsDecision making AND Recycling
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record