Show simple item record

contributor authorJavier Bayod
contributor authorMarta Losa-Iglesias
contributor authorRicardo Becerro de Bengoa-Vallejo
contributor authorJuan Carlos Prados-Frutos
contributor authorKevin T. Jules
contributor authorManuel Doblaré
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:36:37Z
date available2017-05-09T00:36:37Z
date copyrightMay, 2010
date issued2010
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherJBENDY-27136#051002_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/142617
description abstractCorrection of claw or hammer toe deformity can be achieved using various techniques, including proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis (PIPJA), flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer (FDLT), and flexor digitorum brevis transfer. PIPJA is the oldest technique, but is associated with significant complications (infection, fracture, delayed union, and nonunion). FDLT eliminates the deformity, but leads to loss of stability during gait. Flexor digitorum brevis tendon transfer (FDBT) seems to be the best surgical alternative, but it is a recent technique with still limited results. In this work, these three techniques have been analyzed by means of the finite-element method and a comparative analysis was done with the aim of extracting advantages and drawbacks. The results show that the best technique for reducing dorsal displacement of the proximal phalanx is PIPJA (2.28 mm versus 2.73 mm for FDLT, and 3.31 mm for FDBT). However, the best technique for reducing stresses on phalanges is FDLT or FDBT (a reduction of approximately 35% regarding the pathologic case versus the increase of 7% for the PIPJA in tensile stresses, and a reduction of approximately 40% versus 25% for the PIPJA in compression stresses). Moreover, the distribution of stresses in the entire phalanx is different for the PIPJA case. These facts could cause problems for patients, in particular, those with pain in the surgical toe.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAdvantages and Drawbacks of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fusion Versus Flexor Tendon Transfer in the Correction of Hammer and Claw Toe Deformity. A Finite-Element Study
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4001115
journal fristpage51002
identifier eissn1528-8951
keywordsStress
keywordsHammers
keywordsSurgery
keywordsDisplacement
keywordsTendons
keywordsFinite element analysis
keywordsMuscle
keywordsCompressive stress
keywordsTension AND Stability
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record