Show simple item record

contributor authorJian-Zhong Zhao
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:36:04Z
date available2017-05-09T00:36:04Z
date copyrightNovember, 2010
date issued2010
identifier issn0003-6900
identifier otherAMREAD-25938#060803_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/142323
description abstractToupin’s Theorem plays the most influential role in the history of development concerning Saint-Venant’s Principle. We now review the history and the previous works, distinguishing Saint-Venant type decay from Toupin-type decay and arguing that Toupin’s Theorem is not a formulation of Saint-Venant’s Principle; Saint-Venant’s Principle stated by Love can be disproved mathematically from Toupin’s Theorem, so Toupin’s Theorem is mathematically inconsistent with Saint-Venant’s Principle; Modified Saint-Venant’s Principle can be proved or formulated, though Saint-Venant’s Principle in its general form stated by Boussinesq and Love is not true.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleToupin-Type Decay and Saint-Venant’s Principle
typeJournal Paper
journal volume63
journal issue6
journal titleApplied Mechanics Reviews
identifier doi10.1115/1.4004008
journal fristpage60803
identifier eissn0003-6900
keywordsTheorems (Mathematics)
keywordsDensity
keywordsStress
keywordsCylinders
keywordsSaint-Venant's principle
keywordsBoundary-value problems AND Equations
treeApplied Mechanics Reviews:;2010:;volume( 063 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record