| contributor author | Patrick J. Roache | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:33:16Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:33:16Z | |
| date copyright | March, 2009 | |
| date issued | 2009 | |
| identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
| identifier other | JFEGA4-27363#034503_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/140777 | |
| description abstract | Ambiguities, inconsistencies, and recommended interpretations of the commonly cited definition of validation for computational fluid dynamics codes/models are examined. It is shown that the definition-deduction approach is prone to misinterpretation, and that bottom-up descriptions rather than top-down legalistic definitions are to be preferred for science-based engineering and journal policies, though legalistic definitions are necessary for contracts. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Perspective: Validation—What Does It Mean? | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 131 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3077134 | |
| journal fristpage | 34503 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Turbulence | |
| keywords | Engineers | |
| keywords | Accreditation | |
| keywords | Computational fluid dynamics | |
| keywords | Modeling | |
| keywords | Calibration | |
| keywords | Regulations | |
| keywords | Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations | |
| keywords | Model validation AND Design | |
| tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
