Show simple item record

contributor authorMichael J. Rainbow
contributor authorScott W. Wolfe
contributor authorJoseph J. Crisco
contributor authorDouglas C. Moore
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:26:57Z
date available2017-05-09T00:26:57Z
date copyrightAugust, 2008
date issued2008
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherJBENDY-26817#041003_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/137426
description abstractPrevious studies have found gender differences in carpal kinematics, and there are discrepancies in the literature on the location of the flexion∕extension and radio-ulnar deviation rotation axes of the wrist. It has been postulated that these differences are due to carpal bone size differences rather than gender and that they may be resolved by normalizing the kinematics by carpal size. The purpose of this study was to determine if differences in radio-capitate kinematics are a function of size or gender. We also sought to determine if a best-fit pivot point (PvP) describes the radio-capitate joint as a ball-and-socket articulation. By using an in vivo markerless bone registration technique applied to computed tomography scans of 26 male and 28 female wrists, we applied scaling derived from capitate length to radio-capitate kinematics, characterized by a best-fit PvP. We determined if radio-capitate kinematics behave as a ball-and-socket articulation by examining the error in the best-fit PvP. Scaling PvP location completely removed gender differences (P=0.3). This verifies that differences in radio-capitate kinematics are due to size and not gender. The radio-capitate joint did not behave as a perfect ball and socket because helical axes representing anatomical motions such as flexion-extension, radio-ulnar deviation, dart throwers, and antidart throwers, were located at distances up to 4.5mm from the PvP. Although the best-fit PvP did not yield a single center of rotation, it was still consistently found within the proximal pole of the capitate, and rms errors of the best-fit PvP calculation were on the order of 2mm. Therefore, the ball-and-socket model of the wrist joint center using the best-fit PvP is appropriate when considering gross motion of the hand with respect to the forearm such as in optical motion capture models. However, the ball-and-socket model of the wrist is an insufficient description of the complex motion of the capitate with respect to the radius. These findings may aid in the design of wrist external fixation and orthotics.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleGender Differences in Capitate Kinematics are Eliminated After Accounting for Variation in Carpal Size
typeJournal Paper
journal volume130
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.2913332
journal fristpage41003
identifier eissn1528-8951
keywordsKinematics
keywordsMotion
keywordsPoles (Building)
keywordsBone AND Rotation
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record