Show simple item record

contributor authorC. B. Drab
contributor authorG. Offner
contributor authorJ. R. Haslinger
contributor authorR. U. Pfau
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:22:55Z
date available2017-05-09T00:22:55Z
date copyrightOctober, 2007
date issued2007
identifier issn1555-1415
identifier otherJCNDDM-25628#337_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/135314
description abstractWithin the framework of the “floating frame of reference” formulation for dynamic flexible multibody systems, the separation of local and global motion is important. We compare the new approach with reference conditions as algebraic constraints with the classical one leading to a system of ordinary differential equations. The approach using reference conditions is motivated either from the need of keeping the error introduced when linearizing the elastic forces as small as possible (Buckens frame) or from minimizing the relative kinetic energy contained in the elastic deformations (Tisserand frame). The reference conditions impose algebraic constraints on the body level leading to a differential-algebraic equation (DAE) to be solved. The equivalence and the differences of the two approaches are shown. The index of the DAE system with reference conditions is shown to be either 2 or 1.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of the Classical Formulation With the Reference Conditions Formulation for Dynamic Flexible Multibody Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume2
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics
identifier doi10.1115/1.2756066
journal fristpage337
journal lastpage343
identifier eissn1555-1423
keywordsStructural frames
keywordsEquations
keywordsMultibody systems
keywordsMotion AND Force
treeJournal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics:;2007:;volume( 002 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record