Show simple item record

contributor authorLambert Speelman
contributor authorAjay Bohra
contributor authorE. Marielle H. Bosboom
contributor authorFrans N. van de Vosse
contributor authorMichel S. Makaroun
contributor authorDavid A. Vorp
contributor authorGeert Willem H. Schurink
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:22:54Z
date available2017-05-09T00:22:54Z
date copyrightFebruary, 2007
date issued2007
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherJBENDY-26664#105_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/135306
description abstractIt is generally acknowledged that rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) occurs when the stress acting on the wall over the cardiac cycle exceeds the strength of the wall. Peak wall stress computations appear to give a more accurate rupture risk assessment than AAA diameter, which is currently used for a diagnose. Despite the numerous studies utilizing patient-specific wall stress modeling of AAAs, none investigated the effect of wall calcifications on wall stress. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of calcifications on patient-specific finite element stress computations. In addition, we assessed whether the effect of calcifications could be predicted directly from the CT-scans by relating the effect to the amount of calcification present in the AAA wall. For 6 AAAs, the location and extent of calcification was identified from CT-scans. A finite element model was created for each AAA and the areas of calcification were defined node-wise in the mesh of the model. Comparisons are made between maximum principal stress distributions, computed without calcifications and with calcifications with varying material properties. Peak stresses are determined from the stress results and related to a calcification index (CI), a quantification of the amount of calcification in the AAA wall. At calcification sites, local stresses increased, leading to a peak stress increase of 22% in the most severe case. Our results displayed a weak correlation between the CI and the increase in peak stress. Additionally, the results showed a marked influence of the calcification elastic modulus on computed stresses. Inclusion of calcifications in finite element analysis of AAAs resulted in a marked alteration of the stress distributions and should therefore be included in rupture risk assessment. The results also suggest that the location and shape of the calcified regions—not only the relative amount—are considerations that influence the effect on AAA wall stress. The dependency of the effect of the wall stress on the calcification elastic modulus points out the importance of determination of the material properties of calcified AAA wall.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleEffects of Wall Calcifications in Patient-Specific Wall Stress Analyses of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
typeJournal Paper
journal volume129
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.2401189
journal fristpage105
journal lastpage109
identifier eissn1528-8951
keywordsStress
keywordsStress analysis (Engineering)
keywordsMaterials properties
keywordsFinite element analysis
keywordsElastic moduli
keywordsFinite element model
keywordsRupture
keywordsAneurysms
keywordsComputerized tomography
keywordsEngineering simulation
keywordsComputation
keywordsBoundary-value problems AND Shapes
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record