Show simple item record

contributor authorEdwin J. Kokko
contributor authorHarry E. Martz
contributor authorDiane J. Chinn
contributor authorHenry R. Childs
contributor authorJessie A. Jackson
contributor authorDavid H. Chambers
contributor authorDaniel J. Schneberk
contributor authorGrace A. Clark
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:19:11Z
date available2017-05-09T00:19:11Z
date copyrightDecember, 2006
date issued2006
identifier issn1530-9827
identifier otherJCISB6-25970#405_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/133313
description abstractThe goal of “as-built” computational modeling is to incorporate the most representative geometry and material information for an (fabricated or legacy) object into simulations. While most engineering finite element simulations are based on an object’s idealized “as-designed” configuration with information obtained from technical drawings or computer-aided design models, as-built modeling uses nondestructive characterization and metrology techniques to provide the feature information. By incorporating more representative geometry and material features as initial conditions, the uncertainty in the simulation results can be reduced, providing a more realistic understanding of the event and object being modeled. In this paper, key steps and technology areas in the as-built modeling framework are: (1) inspection using nondestructive characterization and metrology techniques; (2) data reduction (signal and image processing including artifact removal, data sensor fusion, and geometric feature extraction); and (3) engineering and physics analysis using finite element codes. We illustrate the process with a cylindrical phantom and include a discussion of the key concepts and areas that need improvement. Our results show that reasonable as-built initial conditions based on a volume overlap criteria can be achieved and that notable differences between simulations of the as-built and as-designed configurations can be observed for a given load case. Specifically, a volume averaged difference of accumulated plastic strain of 3% and local spatially varying differences up to 10%. The example presented provides motivation and justification to engineering teams for the additional effort required in the as-built modeling of high value parts. Further validation of the approach has been proposed as future work.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAs-Built Modeling of Objects for Performance Assessment
typeJournal Paper
journal volume6
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.2353856
journal fristpage405
journal lastpage417
identifier eissn1530-9827
keywordsModeling
keywordsComputerized tomography
keywordsGeometry
keywordsPhantoms
keywordsEpoxy adhesives
keywordsAluminum
keywordsPhysics
keywordsMesh generation
keywordsImage processing
keywordsEngineering simulation
keywordsFinite element analysis AND Nondestructive evaluation
treeJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering:;2006:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record