Show simple item record

contributor authorH. Schmid
contributor authorM. P. Nash
contributor authorA. A. Young
contributor authorP. J. Hunter
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:18:51Z
date available2017-05-09T00:18:51Z
date copyrightOctober, 2006
date issued2006
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherJBENDY-26616#742_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/133162
description abstractThe study of ventricular mechanics—analyzing the distribution of strain and stress in myocardium throughout the cardiac cycle—is crucially dependent on the accuracy of the constitutive law chosen to represent the highly nonlinear and anisotropic properties of passive cardiac muscle. A number of such laws have been proposed and fitted to experimental measurements of stress-strain behavior. Here we examine five of these laws and compare them on the basis of (i) “goodness of fit:” How well they fit a set of six shear deformation tests, (ii) “determinability:” How well determined the objective function is at the optimal parameter fit, and (iii) “variability:” How well determined the material parameters are over the range of experiments. These criteria are utilized to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the constitutive laws.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleMyocardial Material Parameter Estimation—A Comparative Study for Simple Shear
typeJournal Paper
journal volume128
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.2244576
journal fristpage742
journal lastpage750
identifier eissn1528-8951
keywordsShear (Mechanics)
keywordsGoodness-of-fit tests
keywordsForce
keywordsErrors
keywordsParameter estimation
keywordsMyocardium
keywordsBiological tissues
keywordsOptimization
keywordsStress
keywordsDisplacement AND Shear deformation
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2006:;volume( 128 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record