Show simple item record

contributor authorScott Bair
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:18:00Z
date available2017-05-09T00:18:00Z
date copyrightApril, 2005
date issued2005
identifier issn0742-4787
identifier otherJOTRE9-28731#456_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/132725
description abstractThe authors have produced a compelling argument to explain EHL dimple formation as resulting from a temperature-viscosity effect. I believe that their explanation is correct. They have solved the EHL problem for film thickness and traction and compared these with measurements. Any claims of providing quantitatively correct comparisons between experiment and numerical solutions are, however, tainted by the fact that the authors have misrepresented the viscosity of their lubricant in spite of having obtained viscosity measurements.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleDiscussion: “Quantitative Comparisons Between Measured and Solved EHL Dimples in Point Contacts,” (Yang, P., Kaneta, M., and Masuda, S., 2003, ASME J. of Tribology, 125(1), pp. 210–214)
typeJournal Paper
journal volume127
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Tribology
identifier doi10.1115/1.1843162
journal fristpage456
identifier eissn1528-8897
keywordsTribology
keywordsViscosity AND Temperature
treeJournal of Tribology:;2005:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record