| contributor author | David P. Dupplaw | |
| contributor author | David Brunson | |
| contributor author | Anna-Jane E. Vine | |
| contributor author | Colin P. Please | |
| contributor author | Susan M. Lewis | |
| contributor author | Angela M. Dean | |
| contributor author | Andy J. Keane | |
| contributor author | Marcus J. Tindall | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:12:24Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:12:24Z | |
| date copyright | September, 2004 | |
| date issued | 2004 | |
| identifier issn | 1530-9827 | |
| identifier other | JCISB6-25948#218_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/129680 | |
| description abstract | When planning experiments to examine how product performance depends on the design, manufacture and environment of use, there are invariably too few resources to enable a complete investigation of all possible variables (factors). We have developed new algorithms for generating and assessing efficient two-stage group screening strategies which are implemented through a web-based system called GISEL. This system elicits company knowledge which is used to guide the formulation of competing two-stage strategies and, via the algorithms, to provide quantitative assessment of their efficiencies. The two-stage group screening method investigates the effect of a large number of factors by grouping them in a first stage experiment whose results identify factors to be further investigated in a second stage. Central to the success of the procedure is ensuring that the factors considered, and their grouping, are based on the best available knowledge of the product. The web-based software system allows information and ideas to be contributed by engineers at different sites and allows the experiment organizer to use these expert opinions to guide decisions on the planning of group screening experiments. The new group screening algorithms implemented within the software give probability distributions and indications of the total resource needed for the experiment. In addition, the algorithms simulate results from the experiment and estimate the percentage of important or active main effects and interactions that fail to be detected. The approach is illustrated through the planning of an experiment on engine cold start optimization at Jaguar Cars. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | A Web-Based Knowledge Elicitation System (GISEL) for Planning and Assessing Group Screening Experiments for Product Development | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 4 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1778192 | |
| journal fristpage | 218 | |
| journal lastpage | 225 | |
| identifier eissn | 1530-9827 | |
| keywords | Computer software | |
| keywords | Probability | |
| keywords | Noise factors | |
| keywords | Design | |
| keywords | Product development | |
| keywords | Engines | |
| keywords | Automobiles AND Algorithms | |
| tree | Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering:;2004:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |