Show simple item record

contributor authorTimothy J. Johnson
contributor authorResearch Assistant
contributor authorDouglas E. Adams
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:09:05Z
date available2017-05-09T00:09:05Z
date copyrightOctober, 2002
date issued2002
identifier issn1048-9002
identifier otherJVACEK-28863#634_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/127694
description abstractThis article discusses the use of frequency domain transmissibility functions for detecting, locating, and quantifying damage in linear and nonlinear structures. Structural damage affects both the system poles and zeros; however, zeros are much more sensitive than poles to localized damage. This is because zeros depend on the input and output locations whereas poles do not. It is demonstrated here that since transmissibility functions are determined solely by the system zeros, they are potentially better indicators of localized linear and nonlinear types of damage. Furthermore, excitation measurements are not required to compute transmissibility functions so damage indices can be calculated directly from response measurements. It is also demonstrated that sensor arrays can sometimes be used to yield mixed transmissibility functions that are differential in nature, that is, they are less sensitive to gross fluctuations in the dynamic loading or environmental variables.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleTransmissibility as a Differential Indicator of Structural Damage
typeJournal Paper
journal volume124
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Vibration and Acoustics
identifier doi10.1115/1.1500744
journal fristpage634
journal lastpage641
identifier eissn1528-8927
keywordsSensors
keywordsFunctions
keywordsStiffness
keywordsPoles (Building)
keywordsFluctuations (Physics) AND Dynamic testing (Materials)
treeJournal of Vibration and Acoustics:;2002:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record