Show simple item record

contributor authorGregory M. Roach
contributor authorLarry L. Howell
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:08:14Z
date available2017-05-09T00:08:14Z
date copyrightSeptember, 2002
date issued2002
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier otherJMDEDB-27728#485_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/127206
description abstractCompliance criteria are used to evaluate the general class of over-running clutches to determine which type is best suited to benefit from compliance. The criteria used in the evaluation include the presence and angle of rotation of revolute joints, the possibility for part count reduction, the presence of springs, possible reduction in weight, and the method of clutch engagement. Sprag, spring, roller or ball, and ratchet and pawl clutch types were evaluated, and the ratchet and pawl type of over-running clutch was demonstrated to be the most promising. Within this type of over-running clutch, different designs incorporating bending, tension, and compression loading of the pawls were explored to determine the best method for loading the pawls. The clutches were compared using the maximum output torque. It was determined that the clutch incorporating rigid pawls loaded in compression produced the largest output torque. The maximum output torque for this clutch was measured at 65.6 N-m.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleEvaluation and Comparison of Alternative Compliant Overrunning Clutch Designs
typeJournal Paper
journal volume124
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.1480414
journal fristpage485
journal lastpage491
identifier eissn1528-9001
keywordsTorque
keywordsDesign
keywordsCompression
keywordsTension
keywordsSprings
keywordsForce AND Stress
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2002:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record