Show simple item record

contributor authorGeorge S. Constantinescu
contributor authorHugo Pasinato
contributor authorJames R. Forsythe
contributor authorKyle D. Squires
contributor authorYou-Qin Wang
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:07:42Z
date available2017-05-09T00:07:42Z
date copyrightDecember, 2002
date issued2002
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherJFEGA4-27179#904_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/126924
description abstractThe flowfield around a 6:1 prolate spheroid at angle of attack is predicted using solutions of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations and detached-eddy simulation (DES). The calculations were performed at a Reynolds number of 4.2×106, the flow is tripped at x/L=0.2, and the angle of attack α is varied from 10 to 20 deg. RANS calculations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras one-equation model. The influence of corrections to the Spalart-Allmaras model accounting for streamline curvature and a nonlinear constitutive relation are also considered. DES predictions are evaluated against experimental measurements, RANS results, as well as calculations performed without an explicit turbulence model. In general, flowfield predictions of the mean properties from the RANS and DES are similar. Predictions of the axial pressure distribution along the symmetry plane agree well with measured values for 10 deg angle of attack. Changes in the separation characteristics in the aft region alter the axial pressure gradient as the angle of attack increases to 20 deg. With downstream evolution, the wall-flow turning angle becomes more positive, an effect also predicted by the models though the peak-to-peak variation is less than that measured. Azimuthal skin friction variations show the same general trend as the measurements, with a weak minima identifying separation. Corrections for streamline curvature improve prediction of the pressure coefficient in the separated region on the leeward side of the spheroid. While initiated further along the spheroid compared to experimental measurements, predictions of primary and secondary separation agree reasonably well with measured values. Calculations without an explicit turbulence model predict pressure and skin-friction distributions in substantial disagreement with measurements.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleNumerical Investigation of Flow Past a Prolate Spheroid
typeJournal Paper
journal volume124
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.1517571
journal fristpage904
journal lastpage910
identifier eissn1528-901X
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsSeparation (Technology)
keywordsMeasurement
keywordsTurbulence
keywordsReynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations
keywordsPressure
keywordsSkin friction (Fluid dynamics)
keywordsEddies (Fluid dynamics) AND Equations
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2002:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record