Show simple item record

contributor authorM. R. Visbal
contributor authorTechnical Area Leader
contributor authorD. P. Rizzetta
contributor authorSenior Research Aerospace Engineer
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:07:41Z
date available2017-05-09T00:07:41Z
date copyrightDecember, 2002
date issued2002
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherJFEGA4-27179#836_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/126916
description abstractThis work investigates the application of a high-order finite difference method for compressible large-eddy simulations on stretched, curvilinear and dynamic meshes. The solver utilizes 4th and 6th-order compact-differencing schemes for the spatial discretization, coupled with both explicit and implicit time-marching methods. Up to 10th order, Pade-type low-pass spatial filter operators are also incorporated to eliminate the spurious high-frequency modes which inevitably arise due to the lack of inherent dissipation in the spatial scheme. The solution procedure is evaluated for the case of decaying compressible isotropic turbulence and turbulent channel flow. The compact/filtering approach is found to be superior to standard second and fourth-order centered, as well as third-order upwind-biased approximations. For the case of isotropic turbulence, better results are obtained with the compact/filtering method (without an added subgrid-scale model) than with the constant-coefficient and dynamic Smagorinsky models. This is attributed to the fact that the SGS models, unlike the optimized low-pass filter, exert dissipation over a wide range of wave numbers including on some of the resolved scales. For channel flow simulations on coarse meshes, the compact/filtering and dynamic models provide similar results, with no clear advantage achieved by incorporating the SGS model. However, additional computations at higher Reynolds numbers must be considered in order to further evaluate this issue. The accuracy and efficiency of the implicit time-marching method relative to the explicit approach are also evaluated. It is shown that a second-order iterative implicit scheme represents an effective choice for large-eddy simulation of compressible wall-bounded flows.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleLarge-Eddy Simulation on Curvilinear Grids Using Compact Differencing and Filtering Schemes
typeJournal Paper
journal volume124
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.1517564
journal fristpage836
journal lastpage847
identifier eissn1528-901X
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsFiltration
keywordsTurbulence
keywordsEddies (Fluid dynamics)
keywordsSimulation
keywordsWaves
keywordsEnergy dissipation
keywordsEquations
keywordsFilters
keywordsLow-pass filters
keywordsChannel flow
keywordsComputation AND Algorithms
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2002:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record