| contributor author | Jin Wu | |
| contributor author | Graduate Research Assistant | |
| contributor author | Shapour Azarm | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:05:34Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:05:34Z | |
| date copyright | March, 2001 | |
| date issued | 2001 | |
| identifier issn | 1050-0472 | |
| identifier other | JMDEDB-27689#18_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/125650 | |
| description abstract | In this paper, several new set quality metrics are introduced that can be used to evaluate the “goodness” of an observed Pareto solution set. These metrics, which are formulated in closed-form and geometrically illustrated, include hyperarea difference, Pareto spread, accuracy of an observed Pareto frontier, number of distinct choices and cluster. The metrics should enable a designer to either monitor the quality of an observed Pareto solution set as obtained by a multiobjective optimization method, or compare the quality of observed Pareto solution sets as reported by different multiobjective optimization methods. A vibrating platform example is used to demonstrate the calculation of these metrics for an observed Pareto solution set. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Metrics for Quality Assessment of a Multiobjective Design Optimization Solution Set | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 123 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Mechanical Design | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1329875 | |
| journal fristpage | 18 | |
| journal lastpage | 25 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-9001 | |
| keywords | Design | |
| keywords | Optimization AND Pareto optimization | |
| tree | Journal of Mechanical Design:;2001:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
