Show simple item record

contributor authorJoseph M. Gebara
contributor authorDan Dolan
contributor authorStuart Pawsey
contributor authorPhilippe Jeanjean
contributor authorKnut Dahl-Stamnes
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:03:05Z
date available2017-05-09T00:03:05Z
date copyrightNovember, 2000
date issued2000
identifier issn0892-7219
identifier otherJMOEEX-28158#260_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/124131
description abstractThis is the first of four companion papers that present a comprehensive assessment of the effect of sea floor subsidence on the Valhall complex of platforms. The study has included an estimate of the increase in platform failure probability as a function of increased subsidence. Subsidence raises the effective mean still water level and increases the potential for inundation of the deck for extreme storm conditions. Deck wave slam forces generate significantly greater platform loading and lead to: (a) higher levels of structural inelastic response and increased risk of structural failure as well as (b) water reaching the cellar deck, and hence affecting operators as well as equipment. The paper focuses on addressing the first of these two issues. A structural assessment study was performed to address the significance of present and future levels of subsidence on the safety of three North Sea platforms. The study included a systematic assessment procedure that addressed each of the factors that impacted structural integrity issues and reliability concerns. Such factors included: ultimate strength analysis methodologies, tubular joint formulations, group pile effects, and soil-structure interaction, which are described in this paper, as well as deck impact force formulations (Pawsey et al., 1998, “Characterization of Environmental Loads on Subsiding Offshore Platforms,” 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, July) component and system reliability modeling (Jha et al., 2000, “Assessment of Offshore Platforms Under Subsidence—Part II: Analysis and Results,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 122 , pp. 267–273), and acceptance criteria (Stahl et al., 1998, “Acceptance Criteria for Offshore Platforms,” 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, July). This paper presents the assessment procedure, as well as the modeling approach. The paper also discusses the consequence classification of the three platforms and state-of-the-art soil mechanics techniques that lead to a significant increase in the tensile capacity of the foundation. [S0892-7219(00)00204-1]
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAssessment of Offshore Platforms Under Subsidence—Part I: Approach
typeJournal Paper
journal volume122
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.1313530
journal fristpage260
journal lastpage266
identifier eissn1528-896X
keywordsSafety
keywordsReliability
keywordsStress
keywordsWaves
keywordsFailure
keywordsProbability
keywordsSoil
keywordsOffshore platforms
keywordsStorms
keywordsTensile strength
keywordsModeling
keywordsAcceptance criteria
keywordsForce
keywordsSeabed
keywordsStructural failures AND Soil mechanics
treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record