Show simple item record

contributor authorMichele Brocca
contributor authorZdeněk P. Bažant
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:01:33Z
date available2017-05-09T00:01:33Z
date copyrightOctober, 2000
date issued2000
identifier issn0003-6900
identifier otherAMREAD-926177#265_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/123169
description abstractThe microplane model is a versatile constitutive model in which the stress-strain relations are defined in terms of vectors rather than tensors on planes of all possible orientations, called the microplanes, representative of the microstructure of the material. The microplane model with kinematic constraint has been successfully employed in the modeling of concrete, soils, ice, rocks, fiber composites and other quasibrittle materials. The microplane model provides a powerful and efficient numerical tool for the development and implementation of constitutive models for any kind of material. The paper presents a review of the background from which the microplane model stems, highlighting differences and similarities with other approaches. The basic structure of the microplane model is then presented, together with its extension to finite strain deformation. Three microplane models for metal plasticity are introduced and discussed. They are compared mutually and with the classical J2 -flow theory for incremental plasticity by means of two examples. The first is the material response to a nonproportional loading path given by uniaxial compression into the plastic region followed by shear (typical of buckling and bifurcation problems). This example is considered in order to show the capability of the microplane model to represent a vertex on the yield surface. The second example is the ‘tube-squash’ test of a highly ductile steel tube: a finite element computation is run using two microplane models and the J2 -flow theory. One of the microplane models appears to predict more accurately the final shape of the deformed tube, showing an improvement compared to the J2 -flow theory even when the material is not subjected to abrupt changes in the loading path direction. This review article includes 114 references.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleMicroplane Constitutive Model and Metal Plasticity
typeJournal Paper
journal volume53
journal issue10
journal titleApplied Mechanics Reviews
identifier doi10.1115/1.3097329
journal fristpage265
journal lastpage281
identifier eissn0003-6900
keywordsConstitutive equations
keywordsMetals
keywordsPlasticity
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsDeformation
keywordsComposite materials
keywordsSteel
keywordsConcretes
keywordsFibers
keywordsShear (Mechanics)
keywordsTensors
keywordsFinite element analysis
keywordsIce
keywordsModeling
keywordsStress-strain relations
keywordsBifurcation
keywordsBuckling
keywordsCompression
keywordsComputation
keywordsRocks
keywordsShapes AND Soil
treeApplied Mechanics Reviews:;2000:;volume( 053 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record