Show simple item record

contributor authorC. Solliec
contributor authorF. Danbon
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:59:57Z
date available2017-05-08T23:59:57Z
date copyrightDecember, 1999
date issued1999
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherJFEGA4-27145#914_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/122309
description abstractMost technological devices use butterfly valves to check the flow rate and speed, through piping. Their main advantages are their low cost, their mechanical suitability for fast operation, and their small pressure drops when they are fully open. The fluid dynamic torque about the axis of large valves has to be considered as the actuator could be overstrained. This torque is generally defined using a nondimensional coefficient KT , in which the static pressure drop created by the valve is used for normalization. When the valve is closed downstream of an elbow, the valve pressure drop is not well defined. Thus, the classic normalization method gives many ambiguities. To avoid the use of the pressure drop, we define another torque coefficient CT in which the dynamic pressure of the flow is the normalization factor instead of the pressure drop. Advantages and drawbacks of each normalization method are described in the following.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAerodynamic Torque Acting on a Butterfly Valve. Comparison and Choice of a Torque Coefficient
typeJournal Paper
journal volume121
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.2823555
journal fristpage914
journal lastpage917
identifier eissn1528-901X
keywordsTorque
keywordsValves
keywordsPressure drop
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsFluids
keywordsActuators
keywordsPipes AND Pressure
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1999:;volume( 121 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record