Show simple item record

contributor authorR. Y. Grimes
contributor authorR. A. Levine
contributor authorA. P. Yoganathan
contributor authorG. A. Pulido
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:49:23Z
date available2017-05-08T23:49:23Z
date copyrightNovember, 1996
date issued1996
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherJBENDY-25968#498_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/116533
description abstractMitral and tricuspid regurgitation create turbulent jets within the atria. Clinically, for the purpose of estimating regurgitant severity, jet size is assumed to be proportional to peak jet flow rate and regurgitant volume. Unfortunately, the relationship is more complex because the determinants of jet size include interactions between jet pulsatility, jet momentum, atrial width, and the velocity of ambient atrial counterftows. These effects on fluorescent jet penetration were measured using an in vitro simulation. Both steady and pulsatile jets were driven into an opposing counterflow velocity field peak jet length (Ljp ) measurements made as a function of (1) peak orifice velocity (Ujp ), (2) the time required for the jet to accelerate from zero to peak velocity and begin to decelerate (Tjp ), (3) jet orifice diameter (Dj ), (4) counterflow velocity (Uc ), and (5) counterflow tube diameter (Dc ). A compact mathematical description was developed using dimensional analysis. Results showed that peak jet length was a function of the counterflow tube diameter, the ratio of peak jet to counterflow momentum, (Mjp /Mc ) = (Ujp 2 Dj 2 )/(Uc 2 Dc 2 ), and a previously undescribed jet pulsatility parameter, the pulsatility index (PI), PI = Dc 2 /(Tjp Ujp Dj ). For the same jet orifice flow conditions, jet penetration decreased as chamber diameter decreased, as the jet PI increased, and as the momentum ratio decreased. These interactions provide insight into why regurgitant jet size is not always a good estimate of regurgitant severity.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleQuasisteady Behavior of Pulsatile, Confined, Counterflowing Jets: Implications for the Assessment of Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume118
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.2796036
journal fristpage498
journal lastpage505
identifier eissn1528-8951
keywordsJets
keywordsMomentum
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsMeasurement
keywordsTurbulence
keywordsDimensional analysis AND Simulation
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;1996:;volume( 118 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record