Abstract: Construction arbitration is characterized by incessant challenges to its awards. Although these challenges suggest dissatisfaction with the outcomes, the role of perceived fairness in influencing disputants’ cooperative ...

Abstract: The ineffectiveness of dispute resolution remains a major concern to many users of construction arbitration. Despite several complaints regarding high costs, delays, and rejected awards, there is no evidence that any studies ...

Abstract: By referring their disputes to arbitration, users expect a speedy, economical, and satisfactory resolution. While some cases may have achieved these objectives, others have not. It is not uncommon to come across a mix of ...

Abstract: Arbitration has been touted as one of the best methods of resolving construction disputes, largely due to its perceived speed, cost-effectiveness, and finality of the award. However, studies have shown that arbitration has ...

Abstract: Persistent delays remain a major concern to many users of construction arbitration. Despite concerted attempts to identify the causes, the existing literature has made little effort toward explaining why these delays occur. ...

Abstract: The concept of arbitral effectiveness remains an active subject of debate in academia and industry. Despite concerted efforts aimed at enhancing its effectiveness, construction arbitration remains ineffective because much ...