YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Measurement of a Recirculating, Two-Dimensional, Turbulent Flow and Comparison to Turbulence Model Predictions. I: Steady State Case

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1983:;volume( 105 ):;issue: 004::page 439
    Author:
    D. R. Boyle
    ,
    M. W. Golay
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3241026
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Turbulent flow measurements have been performed in a two-dimensional flow cell which is a 1/15-scale model of the Fast Flux Test Facility nuclear reactor outlet plenum. In a steady water flow, maps of the mean velocity field, turbulence kinetic energy, and Reynolds stress have been obtained using a laser doppler anemometer. The measurements are compared to numerical simulations using both the K–ε and K–σ two-equation turbulence models. A relationship between K–σ and K–ε turbulence models is derived, and the two models are found to be nearly equivalent. The steady-state mean velocity data are predicted well through-out most of the test cell. Calculated spatial distributions of the scalar turbulence quantities are qualitatively similar for both models; however, the predicted distributions do not match the data over major portions of the flow area. The K–σ model provides better estimates of the turbulence quantity magnitudes. The predicted results are highly sensitive to small changes in the turbulence model constants and depend heavily on the levels of inlet turbulence. However, important differences between prediction and measurement cannot be significantly reduced by simple changes to the model’s constants.
    keyword(s): Turbulence , Steady state , Flow (Dynamics) , Measurement , Scalars , Lasers , Computer simulation , Kinetic energy , Stress , Equations , Nuclear reactors , Test facilities AND Water ,
    • Download: (784.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Measurement of a Recirculating, Two-Dimensional, Turbulent Flow and Comparison to Turbulence Model Predictions. I: Steady State Case

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/97226
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorD. R. Boyle
    contributor authorM. W. Golay
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:15:44Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:15:44Z
    date copyrightDecember, 1983
    date issued1983
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27000#439_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/97226
    description abstractTurbulent flow measurements have been performed in a two-dimensional flow cell which is a 1/15-scale model of the Fast Flux Test Facility nuclear reactor outlet plenum. In a steady water flow, maps of the mean velocity field, turbulence kinetic energy, and Reynolds stress have been obtained using a laser doppler anemometer. The measurements are compared to numerical simulations using both the K–ε and K–σ two-equation turbulence models. A relationship between K–σ and K–ε turbulence models is derived, and the two models are found to be nearly equivalent. The steady-state mean velocity data are predicted well through-out most of the test cell. Calculated spatial distributions of the scalar turbulence quantities are qualitatively similar for both models; however, the predicted distributions do not match the data over major portions of the flow area. The K–σ model provides better estimates of the turbulence quantity magnitudes. The predicted results are highly sensitive to small changes in the turbulence model constants and depend heavily on the levels of inlet turbulence. However, important differences between prediction and measurement cannot be significantly reduced by simple changes to the model’s constants.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleMeasurement of a Recirculating, Two-Dimensional, Turbulent Flow and Comparison to Turbulence Model Predictions. I: Steady State Case
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume105
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3241026
    journal fristpage439
    journal lastpage446
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsTurbulence
    keywordsSteady state
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsMeasurement
    keywordsScalars
    keywordsLasers
    keywordsComputer simulation
    keywordsKinetic energy
    keywordsStress
    keywordsEquations
    keywordsNuclear reactors
    keywordsTest facilities AND Water
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1983:;volume( 105 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian