YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Low Cycle Fatigue Damage in Pressure-Vessel Materials

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1963:;volume( 085 ):;issue: 004::page 539
    Author:
    J. G. Sessler
    ,
    Volker Weiss
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3656905
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Strain-controlled tension-compression fatigue tests were performed on the ASTM pressure vessel steels, A302 and A225, to study the damage processes that lead to failure in low cycle fatigue. The measurements of static property changes in partially cycled specimens, and hysteresis loop effects obtained during cycling, were utilized to reflect the pattern of damage accumulation. In addition, strain cycling tests were conducted on these materials to assess the applicability of the relationship Nf = εF − ε0εTR2 as proposed by Manson [4] and Coffin [5] and modified by Sachs, et al. [6]. The experimental data obtained were in good agreement with the failure life and the effect of mean strain as predicted by the foregoing equation. Accordingly, a positive mean strain (prestrain in tension) reduces fatigue life, since the fracture strain available for cycling is reduced by the amount of the prestrain. The damage studies indicated, however, that this equation cannot be used to describe the progress of damage during strain cycling. Rather, it appears that damage is governed by at least two, possibly interdependent, processes; namely, the loss of available ductility due to strain hardening and the formation and growth of cracks which finally determine failure. Both processes are reflected in the remaining ductility after partial cycling. At present, it is not clear how the two processes combine to yield the experimentally confirmed relationship, Nf = εF − ε0εTR2.
    keyword(s): Pressure vessels , Low cycle fatigue , Failure , Ductility , Tension , Equations , Work hardening , ASTM International , Fracture (Process) , Compression , Fatigue life , Fatigue testing , Steel AND Measurement ,
    • Download: (3.149Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Low Cycle Fatigue Damage in Pressure-Vessel Materials

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/94857
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJ. G. Sessler
    contributor authorVolker Weiss
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:11:38Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:11:38Z
    date copyrightDecember, 1963
    date issued1963
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27252#539_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/94857
    description abstractStrain-controlled tension-compression fatigue tests were performed on the ASTM pressure vessel steels, A302 and A225, to study the damage processes that lead to failure in low cycle fatigue. The measurements of static property changes in partially cycled specimens, and hysteresis loop effects obtained during cycling, were utilized to reflect the pattern of damage accumulation. In addition, strain cycling tests were conducted on these materials to assess the applicability of the relationship Nf = εF − ε0εTR2 as proposed by Manson [4] and Coffin [5] and modified by Sachs, et al. [6]. The experimental data obtained were in good agreement with the failure life and the effect of mean strain as predicted by the foregoing equation. Accordingly, a positive mean strain (prestrain in tension) reduces fatigue life, since the fracture strain available for cycling is reduced by the amount of the prestrain. The damage studies indicated, however, that this equation cannot be used to describe the progress of damage during strain cycling. Rather, it appears that damage is governed by at least two, possibly interdependent, processes; namely, the loss of available ductility due to strain hardening and the formation and growth of cracks which finally determine failure. Both processes are reflected in the remaining ductility after partial cycling. At present, it is not clear how the two processes combine to yield the experimentally confirmed relationship, Nf = εF − ε0εTR2.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleLow Cycle Fatigue Damage in Pressure-Vessel Materials
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume85
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3656905
    journal fristpage539
    journal lastpage545
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsPressure vessels
    keywordsLow cycle fatigue
    keywordsFailure
    keywordsDuctility
    keywordsTension
    keywordsEquations
    keywordsWork hardening
    keywordsASTM International
    keywordsFracture (Process)
    keywordsCompression
    keywordsFatigue life
    keywordsFatigue testing
    keywordsSteel AND Measurement
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1963:;volume( 085 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian