YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of Five Methods of Calculating Aerodynamic Stagnation-Point Heat Transfer at Velocities of 25,000 to 40,000 fps

    Source: Journal of Applied Mechanics:;1963:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 003::page 430
    Author:
    Stefan Schreier
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3636574
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Five methods of calculating aerodynamic stagnation-point heat transfer at velocities of 25,000 to 40,000 fps are considered. Three of these methods are simple extrapolations of techniques previously developed for calculations below 25,000 fps. The other two are methods especially developed for velocities above 25,000 fps. The five methods are: The method of Fay and Riddell [1]; the method of Scala [2]; the reference enthalpy method [3]; the method of Adams [4]; and the method of Cohen [5]. Methods [4] and [5] are the methods developed for the higher velocities. The results are presented in graphical form. It is found that the extrapolation of the reference enthalpy method and the correlation formula of Fay and Riddell yield results so close to those of Cohen that, in view of the uncertainties involved in the latter method, using the former two methods over the range of values considered in the present paper yields results at least as satisfactory as those of Cohen for equilibrium flow. Furthermore it is found that extrapolation of the formula of Fay and Riddell for frozen flow yields results sufficiently close to those obtained by the method of Adams that, in view of the uncertainties of the latter method, the advantage of its use over the former in the range of values under consideration is questionable.
    keyword(s): Heat transfer , Enthalpy , Formulas , Flow (Dynamics) AND Equilibrium (Physics) ,
    • Download: (2.113Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of Five Methods of Calculating Aerodynamic Stagnation-Point Heat Transfer at Velocities of 25,000 to 40,000 fps

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/93023
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorStefan Schreier
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:08:13Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:08:13Z
    date copyrightSeptember, 1963
    date issued1963
    identifier issn0021-8936
    identifier otherJAMCAV-25720#430_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/93023
    description abstractFive methods of calculating aerodynamic stagnation-point heat transfer at velocities of 25,000 to 40,000 fps are considered. Three of these methods are simple extrapolations of techniques previously developed for calculations below 25,000 fps. The other two are methods especially developed for velocities above 25,000 fps. The five methods are: The method of Fay and Riddell [1]; the method of Scala [2]; the reference enthalpy method [3]; the method of Adams [4]; and the method of Cohen [5]. Methods [4] and [5] are the methods developed for the higher velocities. The results are presented in graphical form. It is found that the extrapolation of the reference enthalpy method and the correlation formula of Fay and Riddell yield results so close to those of Cohen that, in view of the uncertainties involved in the latter method, using the former two methods over the range of values considered in the present paper yields results at least as satisfactory as those of Cohen for equilibrium flow. Furthermore it is found that extrapolation of the formula of Fay and Riddell for frozen flow yields results sufficiently close to those obtained by the method of Adams that, in view of the uncertainties of the latter method, the advantage of its use over the former in the range of values under consideration is questionable.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparison of Five Methods of Calculating Aerodynamic Stagnation-Point Heat Transfer at Velocities of 25,000 to 40,000 fps
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume30
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Applied Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3636574
    journal fristpage430
    journal lastpage434
    identifier eissn1528-9036
    keywordsHeat transfer
    keywordsEnthalpy
    keywordsFormulas
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics) AND Equilibrium (Physics)
    treeJournal of Applied Mechanics:;1963:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian