YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Protection of Drain Pumps Against Transient Cavitation

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1976:;volume( 098 ):;issue: 003::page 401
    Author:
    G. S. Liao
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3446201
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: It has been known that drain pumps in nuclear power plants may suffer cavitation under transient turbine load reductions [1]. Although increasing the size and height of the drain tank can prevent it, such provisions are often not practical, and in some instances even not possible. Some components, such as moisture separators, normally drain through drain receivers into the surface heater or drain tank. Since the drains are at the saturation condition, the drainage is generally accomplished by gravity. This necessitates locating the moisture separators considerably above the drain tank. With a limited physical elevation of the moisture separators relative to the main turbine in connection with a low profile of nuclear power plants, it is impractical to raise the heater-drain tank system somewhat similar to the deaerator in fossil power plants. This paper explores some conceptual protective methods, and briefly discusses their pros and cons as applied to both drain pumping forward and backward systems. The method of quantitative determination of design parameters required for each protective method is either referred to or derived. Based on simplicity, economy, and reliability, this paper concludes that the drain tank pressure decay control system appears to be the most promising protective method for the drain pumping forward system, whereas either the continuous feedwater injection system or the continuous drain subcooling system is the optimum method for the drain pumping backward system.
    keyword(s): Cavitation , Pumps , Turbines , Nuclear power stations , Subcooling , Fossil fuels , Industrial plants , Feedwater , Design , Economics , Pressure , Gravity (Force) , Drainage , Control systems , Reliability AND Stress ,
    • Download: (893.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Protection of Drain Pumps Against Transient Cavitation

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/88572
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorG. S. Liao
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:00:35Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:00:35Z
    date copyrightJuly, 1976
    date issued1976
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-26726#401_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/88572
    description abstractIt has been known that drain pumps in nuclear power plants may suffer cavitation under transient turbine load reductions [1]. Although increasing the size and height of the drain tank can prevent it, such provisions are often not practical, and in some instances even not possible. Some components, such as moisture separators, normally drain through drain receivers into the surface heater or drain tank. Since the drains are at the saturation condition, the drainage is generally accomplished by gravity. This necessitates locating the moisture separators considerably above the drain tank. With a limited physical elevation of the moisture separators relative to the main turbine in connection with a low profile of nuclear power plants, it is impractical to raise the heater-drain tank system somewhat similar to the deaerator in fossil power plants. This paper explores some conceptual protective methods, and briefly discusses their pros and cons as applied to both drain pumping forward and backward systems. The method of quantitative determination of design parameters required for each protective method is either referred to or derived. Based on simplicity, economy, and reliability, this paper concludes that the drain tank pressure decay control system appears to be the most promising protective method for the drain pumping forward system, whereas either the continuous feedwater injection system or the continuous drain subcooling system is the optimum method for the drain pumping backward system.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleProtection of Drain Pumps Against Transient Cavitation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume98
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3446201
    journal fristpage401
    journal lastpage410
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsCavitation
    keywordsPumps
    keywordsTurbines
    keywordsNuclear power stations
    keywordsSubcooling
    keywordsFossil fuels
    keywordsIndustrial plants
    keywordsFeedwater
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsEconomics
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsGravity (Force)
    keywordsDrainage
    keywordsControl systems
    keywordsReliability AND Stress
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1976:;volume( 098 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian