YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Implementing Smart Controllers on Single-Family Homes with Excessive Irrigation

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    S. L. Davis
    ,
    M. D. Dukes
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000920
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In this study, smart irrigation controllers were targeted toward single-family potable water customers in Orange County, Florida with excessive landscape irrigation patterns. Out of five treatments, four treatments received either an evapotranspiration controller (ET) or soil moisture sensor (SMS) controller, installed by a contractor, but two technology treatments included an educational program (+Pgm) component. The fifth treatment was a comparison treatment (MO) with no interventions to their normal irrigation scheduling methods. After 22 months of evaluation, both +Pgm treatments reduced irrigation application, ranging from 21 to 52%. However, none of the treatments performed with high efficiency in all seasons. Only a few treatments were able to maintain irrigation totals within a gross irrigation requirement (GIR) range from 60 to 100% efficiency. The technology treatments that participated in the customized educational program were more likely to achieve additional reductions in irrigation application compared with the technology only treatments. Additionally, there was higher consistency in efficient irrigation application by the SMS technology than the ET technology. The SMS+Pgm was the most efficient regardless of soil type with weekly irrigation for SMS+Pgm averaging 11–13 mm per week in the flatwoods locations and water savings of 34–52% across all seasons. In the sand locations, weekly irrigation averaged 16–22 mm for ET+Pgm, SMS, and SMS+Pgm, resulting in very little difference among these treatments. Dry season water savings for these three treatments was 4–35% with increased savings of 21–43% in the wet seasons. The ET controllers may require technological advancement combined with additional educational opportunities to achieve the same consistency of water savings as the SMS. Additional irrigation reduction is possible with both controllers tested here in most cases and may be achieved with education or additional customized programming and setup.
    • Download: (432.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Implementing Smart Controllers on Single-Family Homes with Excessive Irrigation

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/82984
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorS. L. Davis
    contributor authorM. D. Dukes
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:34:44Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:34:44Z
    date copyrightDecember 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other50174359.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/82984
    description abstractIn this study, smart irrigation controllers were targeted toward single-family potable water customers in Orange County, Florida with excessive landscape irrigation patterns. Out of five treatments, four treatments received either an evapotranspiration controller (ET) or soil moisture sensor (SMS) controller, installed by a contractor, but two technology treatments included an educational program (+Pgm) component. The fifth treatment was a comparison treatment (MO) with no interventions to their normal irrigation scheduling methods. After 22 months of evaluation, both +Pgm treatments reduced irrigation application, ranging from 21 to 52%. However, none of the treatments performed with high efficiency in all seasons. Only a few treatments were able to maintain irrigation totals within a gross irrigation requirement (GIR) range from 60 to 100% efficiency. The technology treatments that participated in the customized educational program were more likely to achieve additional reductions in irrigation application compared with the technology only treatments. Additionally, there was higher consistency in efficient irrigation application by the SMS technology than the ET technology. The SMS+Pgm was the most efficient regardless of soil type with weekly irrigation for SMS+Pgm averaging 11–13 mm per week in the flatwoods locations and water savings of 34–52% across all seasons. In the sand locations, weekly irrigation averaged 16–22 mm for ET+Pgm, SMS, and SMS+Pgm, resulting in very little difference among these treatments. Dry season water savings for these three treatments was 4–35% with increased savings of 21–43% in the wet seasons. The ET controllers may require technological advancement combined with additional educational opportunities to achieve the same consistency of water savings as the SMS. Additional irrigation reduction is possible with both controllers tested here in most cases and may be achieved with education or additional customized programming and setup.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleImplementing Smart Controllers on Single-Family Homes with Excessive Irrigation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume141
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000920
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian