Show simple item record

contributor authorJingfeng Yuan
contributor authorAlbert P. C. Chan
contributor authorBo Xia
contributor authorMirosław J. Skibniewski
contributor authorWei Xiong
contributor authorChuang Ji
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:29:12Z
date available2017-05-08T22:29:12Z
date copyrightJune 2016
date issued2016
identifier other46521999.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/81402
description abstractPublic private partnerships (PPPs) have been adopted widely to provide public facilities and services. According to the PPP agreement, PPP projects would be transferred to the public sector. However, problems related to the subsequent management of ongoing PPP projects have not been studied thoroughly. Residual value risk (RVR) can occur if the public sector cannot obtain the project in the desired conditions as required in the agreement when a project is being transferred. RVR has been identified as an important risk in PPPs and has greatly influenced the outputs of the projects. In order to further observe the change of residual value (RV) during the process of PPP projects and to reveal the internal mechanism for reducing the RVR, a comparative case study of two PPP projects in mainland China and Hong Kong was conducted. Based on the case study, different factors leading to RVR and a series of key risk indicators (KRIs) were identified. The comparison demonstrates that RVR is an important risk that could influence the success of PPP projects. The cumulative effects during the concession period can play significant roles in the occurrence of RVR. Additionally, the cumulative effects in different cases can make the RVR different because of different stakeholders’ efforts on the projects and ways to treat RVR. Finally, alternatives for the public sector to treat RVR were proposed. The findings of this research can reduce RVR and improve the performance of PPP projects.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCumulative Effects on the Change of Residual Value in PPP Projects: A Comparative Case Study
typeJournal Paper
journal volume22
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000272
treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2016:;Volume ( 022 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record