YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Natural Hazards Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Natural Hazards Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Lifeline Issue in Social Vulnerability Indexing: A Review of Indicators and Discussion of Indicator Application

    Source: Natural Hazards Review:;2015:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Ivar Svare Holand
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000148
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The article reviews ways to improve measurements of lifeline vulnerability, defining lifeline vulnerability as aspects of social vulnerability to natural hazards influenced by lifeline failure. First, a literature review of indicators commonly used to address lifeline vulnerability within social vulnerability indexing is presented, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the study. Then, nine lifeline vulnerability indicators for central Norway are mapped to provide a practical basis. Thereafter, the author uses the theoretical and practical basis to discuss some problematic issues with respect to indicator selection. The review shows that to date assessments have addressed narrow segments of the broad range of factors influencing lifeline vulnerability. The map examples underscore that an indicator must be validated for each context, and that minor variations on the definition of a lifeline indicator is a critical process. Lifeline indicators represent life situations that conceptually stand apart from indicators representing social categories or exposure. Due to interdependencies among lifeline systems and because of the spatial irregularity of people’s dependence on lifelines, it is difficult to determine both the spatial extent of outage and the social consequences. Further, because of lifeline vulnerability’s distinct conceptual and spatial characteristics, the author suggests that it should be indexed separately from social factors, exposure, and risk.
    • Download: (18.97Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Lifeline Issue in Social Vulnerability Indexing: A Review of Indicators and Discussion of Indicator Application

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/81345
    Collections
    • Natural Hazards Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorIvar Svare Holand
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:29:00Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:29:00Z
    date copyrightAugust 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other46374539.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/81345
    description abstractThe article reviews ways to improve measurements of lifeline vulnerability, defining lifeline vulnerability as aspects of social vulnerability to natural hazards influenced by lifeline failure. First, a literature review of indicators commonly used to address lifeline vulnerability within social vulnerability indexing is presented, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the study. Then, nine lifeline vulnerability indicators for central Norway are mapped to provide a practical basis. Thereafter, the author uses the theoretical and practical basis to discuss some problematic issues with respect to indicator selection. The review shows that to date assessments have addressed narrow segments of the broad range of factors influencing lifeline vulnerability. The map examples underscore that an indicator must be validated for each context, and that minor variations on the definition of a lifeline indicator is a critical process. Lifeline indicators represent life situations that conceptually stand apart from indicators representing social categories or exposure. Due to interdependencies among lifeline systems and because of the spatial irregularity of people’s dependence on lifelines, it is difficult to determine both the spatial extent of outage and the social consequences. Further, because of lifeline vulnerability’s distinct conceptual and spatial characteristics, the author suggests that it should be indexed separately from social factors, exposure, and risk.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleLifeline Issue in Social Vulnerability Indexing: A Review of Indicators and Discussion of Indicator Application
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume16
    journal issue3
    journal titleNatural Hazards Review
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000148
    treeNatural Hazards Review:;2015:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian