YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Artifact-Based Energy Literacy Assessment Utilizing Rubric Scoring

    Source: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Quinn Langfitt
    ,
    Liv Haselbach
    ,
    R. Justin Hougham
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000210
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This research focuses on the development of an energy literacy rubric for scoring project-type deliverables, an approach that has not been taken with respect to energy literacy assessment. The goal is to examine if a rubric-based rating approach is applicable for judging energy literacy based on competition or course deliverables or artifacts. The rubric was developed using a methodology involving related rubric review and adaptation, and an expert review. To examine if the rubric approach may be applicable, the rubric was applied to the Imagine Tomorrow competition, a high school energy competition, and trends in the results were examined to support rubric effectiveness. Competition deliverables include an abstract and a poster. Abstracts submitted to enter the competition from 5 years were available and evaluated for energy literacy and biofuel literacy by two raters. Posters were available only for 1 year and were rated by one rater. Besides identifying trends in the abstract scores, the abstract scores were used to test interrater reliability in which consistency was found to be high. Based on expected trends occurring in both the abstract and poster scores, and the high interrater consistency, it was determined that the rubric rating approach appears to be working effectively, at least for a preliminary evaluation. Future development and refinement of this type of energy literacy rubric may serve to enhance assessment of sustainability educational activity endeavors based purely on the artifacts involved.
    • Download: (2.476Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Artifact-Based Energy Literacy Assessment Utilizing Rubric Scoring

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/79143
    Collections
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorQuinn Langfitt
    contributor authorLiv Haselbach
    contributor authorR. Justin Hougham
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:22:55Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:22:55Z
    date copyrightApril 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other43792577.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/79143
    description abstractThis research focuses on the development of an energy literacy rubric for scoring project-type deliverables, an approach that has not been taken with respect to energy literacy assessment. The goal is to examine if a rubric-based rating approach is applicable for judging energy literacy based on competition or course deliverables or artifacts. The rubric was developed using a methodology involving related rubric review and adaptation, and an expert review. To examine if the rubric approach may be applicable, the rubric was applied to the Imagine Tomorrow competition, a high school energy competition, and trends in the results were examined to support rubric effectiveness. Competition deliverables include an abstract and a poster. Abstracts submitted to enter the competition from 5 years were available and evaluated for energy literacy and biofuel literacy by two raters. Posters were available only for 1 year and were rated by one rater. Besides identifying trends in the abstract scores, the abstract scores were used to test interrater reliability in which consistency was found to be high. Based on expected trends occurring in both the abstract and poster scores, and the high interrater consistency, it was determined that the rubric rating approach appears to be working effectively, at least for a preliminary evaluation. Future development and refinement of this type of energy literacy rubric may serve to enhance assessment of sustainability educational activity endeavors based purely on the artifacts involved.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleArtifact-Based Energy Literacy Assessment Utilizing Rubric Scoring
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume141
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000210
    treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian