YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Construction Considerations for ISS Bench-Scale Studies and Field-Scale Monitoring Programs

    Source: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste:;2015:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    K. B. Andromalos
    ,
    D. G. Ruffing
    ,
    V. A. Spillane
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000245
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In situ solidification/stabilization (ISS) projects require a significant amount of characterization, sampling, and bench-scale testing in the design or feasibility phase to ensure a successful project. During this phase the proposed construction methods need to be considered, taking into account such things as slurry proportions, untreated soil type/density, treated soil consistency, and soil/contaminant variability. As the project moves from the preconstruction phase into the construction phase, the results of the design phase are used to refine key project objectives which may include target improvements for permeability, strength, and/or leachability. A quality control/quality assurance monitoring program, which may include a combination of process controls, in-situ testing, and laboratory testing on grab samples, is then developed to confirm that the key project objectives are achieved. Process controls provide immediate feedback but generally do not directly measure the target properties. Many of the available in situ testing methods were not developed for ISS mixtures and are therefore limited for use in this application. Finally, many of the laboratory tests conducted on field collected grab samples, specifically leachability tests, require long lead times and therefore provide limited real-time feedback. In order to account for the advantages and disadvantages of each monitoring method, the quality control/quality assurance monitoring program should include a combination of short and long turnaround testing to be used collectively to predict the long-term performance of the improved material.
    • Download: (16.45Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Construction Considerations for ISS Bench-Scale Studies and Field-Scale Monitoring Programs

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/73072
    Collections
    • Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste

    Show full item record

    contributor authorK. B. Andromalos
    contributor authorD. G. Ruffing
    contributor authorV. A. Spillane
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:11:12Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:11:12Z
    date copyrightJanuary 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other37776803.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/73072
    description abstractIn situ solidification/stabilization (ISS) projects require a significant amount of characterization, sampling, and bench-scale testing in the design or feasibility phase to ensure a successful project. During this phase the proposed construction methods need to be considered, taking into account such things as slurry proportions, untreated soil type/density, treated soil consistency, and soil/contaminant variability. As the project moves from the preconstruction phase into the construction phase, the results of the design phase are used to refine key project objectives which may include target improvements for permeability, strength, and/or leachability. A quality control/quality assurance monitoring program, which may include a combination of process controls, in-situ testing, and laboratory testing on grab samples, is then developed to confirm that the key project objectives are achieved. Process controls provide immediate feedback but generally do not directly measure the target properties. Many of the available in situ testing methods were not developed for ISS mixtures and are therefore limited for use in this application. Finally, many of the laboratory tests conducted on field collected grab samples, specifically leachability tests, require long lead times and therefore provide limited real-time feedback. In order to account for the advantages and disadvantages of each monitoring method, the quality control/quality assurance monitoring program should include a combination of short and long turnaround testing to be used collectively to predict the long-term performance of the improved material.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleConstruction Considerations for ISS Bench-Scale Studies and Field-Scale Monitoring Programs
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume19
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000245
    treeJournal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste:;2015:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian