YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Consolidation of Basics of Dimensional Analysis

    Source: Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;1984:;Volume ( 110 ):;issue: 009
    Author:
    David I. H. Barr
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:9(1357)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The echelon matrix procedure is introduced, as a new base procedure for dimensional analysis, by its application to examples selected by previous authors. It is thereby shown that Buckingham's actual and very perceptive enumeration of the number of nondimensional groups is never in error, despite repeated claims to the contrary. The achievement or the forcing of the echelon matrix formation is shown also to be the natural entry to the stepwise and the proportionality‐stepwise procedures, which, like the basic echelon matrix procedure, offer advantages in straightforward execution, over the traditional, nonintegrated, procedures for dimensional analysis which are ascribed to Rayleigh and to Buckingham. The echelon matrix procedure is also shown to be valuable in examination of various initiatives and claimed improvements to dimensional analysis of the past and present. Vector lengths or “directional analysis” and such concepts are reviewed, and their supposed advantages are shown to be based on misconceptions. It is then shown that the stepwise‐proportionality procedure alone offers an infallible check in the matter of dimensional homogeneity of the variables. An outline is given of the logical sequence of arrangement of variables and execution of analysis by the alternative procedures. Overall, it is shown that dimensional analysis is still a meaningful method for the future provided it is dissociated from past and current misconceptions and some supposed improvements, and is taught and executed in a manner which relates it to the mainstream of basic modern mathematics.
    • Download: (1.102Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Consolidation of Basics of Dimensional Analysis

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/73041
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDavid I. H. Barr
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:11:06Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:11:06Z
    date copyrightSeptember 1984
    date issued1984
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%281984%29110%3A9%281357%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/73041
    description abstractThe echelon matrix procedure is introduced, as a new base procedure for dimensional analysis, by its application to examples selected by previous authors. It is thereby shown that Buckingham's actual and very perceptive enumeration of the number of nondimensional groups is never in error, despite repeated claims to the contrary. The achievement or the forcing of the echelon matrix formation is shown also to be the natural entry to the stepwise and the proportionality‐stepwise procedures, which, like the basic echelon matrix procedure, offer advantages in straightforward execution, over the traditional, nonintegrated, procedures for dimensional analysis which are ascribed to Rayleigh and to Buckingham. The echelon matrix procedure is also shown to be valuable in examination of various initiatives and claimed improvements to dimensional analysis of the past and present. Vector lengths or “directional analysis” and such concepts are reviewed, and their supposed advantages are shown to be based on misconceptions. It is then shown that the stepwise‐proportionality procedure alone offers an infallible check in the matter of dimensional homogeneity of the variables. An outline is given of the logical sequence of arrangement of variables and execution of analysis by the alternative procedures. Overall, it is shown that dimensional analysis is still a meaningful method for the future provided it is dissociated from past and current misconceptions and some supposed improvements, and is taught and executed in a manner which relates it to the mainstream of basic modern mathematics.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleConsolidation of Basics of Dimensional Analysis
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume110
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:9(1357)
    treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;1984:;Volume ( 110 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian