YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Water Retention and Gas Migration of Two High-Performance Concretes after Damage

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    S. M’Jahad
    ,
    C. A. Davy
    ,
    X. Bourbon
    ,
    F. Skoczylas
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001028
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In the context of long-term repository of high-level and long-lived nuclear waste, authors investigate different concrete properties related to fluid transport, in order to determine which is able to detect damage earliest. To this purpose, different protocols are tested, which impose progressive damage to two different Andra high-performance concretes (HPCs), based on pure portland (CEMI) or composed cement (CEMV)-type cements. The properties investigated are pore size distributions and porosity [by mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP)], water retention curves, relative gas permeability, and gas migration properties (gas breakthrough pressure). Gas breakthrough pressure (GBP) is assessed rather than gas entry, by accurately measuring gas presence on the downstream side of a confined sample subjected to slowly increasing gas pressure on its upstream side. From MIP data, authors show that CEMI concrete has smaller porosity but greater pore sizes than CEMV. For CEMI concrete, all damage procedures significantly affect water retention curves and gas breakthrough pressures, yet they have no effect upon the relationship between relative gas permeability and water saturation. For CEMV concrete subjected to low damage levels, gas breakthrough measurements detect damage, whereas water retention and gas permeability do not.
    • Download: (4.646Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Water Retention and Gas Migration of Two High-Performance Concretes after Damage

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/72158
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorS. M’Jahad
    contributor authorC. A. Davy
    contributor authorX. Bourbon
    contributor authorF. Skoczylas
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:08:28Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:08:28Z
    date copyrightFebruary 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other32382119.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/72158
    description abstractIn the context of long-term repository of high-level and long-lived nuclear waste, authors investigate different concrete properties related to fluid transport, in order to determine which is able to detect damage earliest. To this purpose, different protocols are tested, which impose progressive damage to two different Andra high-performance concretes (HPCs), based on pure portland (CEMI) or composed cement (CEMV)-type cements. The properties investigated are pore size distributions and porosity [by mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP)], water retention curves, relative gas permeability, and gas migration properties (gas breakthrough pressure). Gas breakthrough pressure (GBP) is assessed rather than gas entry, by accurately measuring gas presence on the downstream side of a confined sample subjected to slowly increasing gas pressure on its upstream side. From MIP data, authors show that CEMI concrete has smaller porosity but greater pore sizes than CEMV. For CEMI concrete, all damage procedures significantly affect water retention curves and gas breakthrough pressures, yet they have no effect upon the relationship between relative gas permeability and water saturation. For CEMV concrete subjected to low damage levels, gas breakthrough measurements detect damage, whereas water retention and gas permeability do not.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleWater Retention and Gas Migration of Two High-Performance Concretes after Damage
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume27
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001028
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian