YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Profitability Evaluation of Intelligent Transport System Investments

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2002:;Volume ( 128 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Pekka Leviäkangas
    ,
    Jukka Lähesmaa
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:3(276)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The objective of this study was to consider evaluation methods for intelligent transport system (ITS) investments, to point out some shortcomings of traditional methods (mainly benefit-cost analysis), to develop alternative methods, and to make recommendations for how the profitability of ITS investment should be evaluated. The results can be used when ITS investments are compared with each other and also when ITS investments are compared with road building investments. This work identifies the fundamental differences between ITS and road infrastructure investments and how they impact on the profitability evaluation. The conclusion is that traditional cost-benefit analysis (BCA), which was developed for investments in physical infrastructure, does not capture all the benefits or costs related to ITS. Economic evaluation methods for ITS investments need improving. This work illustrates how BCA could be used to take into consideration the option value of ITS investment and risks caused by, for example, different time horizons of investments. The work also discusses and demonstrates the use of multicriteria analysis in profitability evaluation. It illustrates how a method called analytical hierarchy process could be utilized to evaluate other risks that do not have specific monetary values and to compare the results of different profitability analyses. These evaluation methods can be used within the project assessment framework in the transport sector to highlight different aspects of the profitability and efficiency of transport investments. None of the methods themselves can reflect all aspects in decision making, but by using a suitable set of different methods depending on the decision situation and by comparing the results, a wider and more realistic picture of investments can be obtained.
    • Download: (594.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Profitability Evaluation of Intelligent Transport System Investments

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/71958
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPekka Leviäkangas
    contributor authorJukka Lähesmaa
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:07:56Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:07:56Z
    date copyrightMay 2002
    date issued2002
    identifier other30451639.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/71958
    description abstractThe objective of this study was to consider evaluation methods for intelligent transport system (ITS) investments, to point out some shortcomings of traditional methods (mainly benefit-cost analysis), to develop alternative methods, and to make recommendations for how the profitability of ITS investment should be evaluated. The results can be used when ITS investments are compared with each other and also when ITS investments are compared with road building investments. This work identifies the fundamental differences between ITS and road infrastructure investments and how they impact on the profitability evaluation. The conclusion is that traditional cost-benefit analysis (BCA), which was developed for investments in physical infrastructure, does not capture all the benefits or costs related to ITS. Economic evaluation methods for ITS investments need improving. This work illustrates how BCA could be used to take into consideration the option value of ITS investment and risks caused by, for example, different time horizons of investments. The work also discusses and demonstrates the use of multicriteria analysis in profitability evaluation. It illustrates how a method called analytical hierarchy process could be utilized to evaluate other risks that do not have specific monetary values and to compare the results of different profitability analyses. These evaluation methods can be used within the project assessment framework in the transport sector to highlight different aspects of the profitability and efficiency of transport investments. None of the methods themselves can reflect all aspects in decision making, but by using a suitable set of different methods depending on the decision situation and by comparing the results, a wider and more realistic picture of investments can be obtained.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleProfitability Evaluation of Intelligent Transport System Investments
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume128
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:3(276)
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2002:;Volume ( 128 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian