YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Penetrometer Testing: Effect of Partial Consolidation on Subsequent Dissipation Response

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Hamed
    ,
    Mahmoodzadeh
    ,
    Mark F.
    ,
    Randolph
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001114
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Partial drainage during a penetration test increases the penetration resistance, and also affects the excess pore pressures generated and the form of any subsequent dissipation test. This complicates interpretation of such tests, particularly in soils of intermediate consolidation characteristics, because it is difficult to obtain an accurate estimate of the coefficient of consolidation from which to assess the degree of consolidation during penetration. The effect of partial consolidation during penetration on subsequent dissipation tests is investigated here through a number of model piezocone and piezoball tests conducted in a single soil sample under centrifuge conditions. Backbone curves of penetration resistance and excess pore pressure are devised, and comparisons are made of the form of the dissipation response for the two types of penetrometers and for two different pore pressure monitoring positions on the piezoball. Different methods are proposed for assessing the degree of consolidation during the penetration phase, thus allowing the consolidation coefficient to be estimated with reasonable accuracy. Advantages of monitoring pore pressure at two different locations on the piezoball are argued.
    • Download: (2.128Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Penetrometer Testing: Effect of Partial Consolidation on Subsequent Dissipation Response

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/71279
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHamed
    contributor authorMahmoodzadeh
    contributor authorMark F.
    contributor authorRandolph
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:05:56Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:05:56Z
    date copyrightJune 2014
    date issued2014
    identifier other26141834.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/71279
    description abstractPartial drainage during a penetration test increases the penetration resistance, and also affects the excess pore pressures generated and the form of any subsequent dissipation test. This complicates interpretation of such tests, particularly in soils of intermediate consolidation characteristics, because it is difficult to obtain an accurate estimate of the coefficient of consolidation from which to assess the degree of consolidation during penetration. The effect of partial consolidation during penetration on subsequent dissipation tests is investigated here through a number of model piezocone and piezoball tests conducted in a single soil sample under centrifuge conditions. Backbone curves of penetration resistance and excess pore pressure are devised, and comparisons are made of the form of the dissipation response for the two types of penetrometers and for two different pore pressure monitoring positions on the piezoball. Different methods are proposed for assessing the degree of consolidation during the penetration phase, thus allowing the consolidation coefficient to be estimated with reasonable accuracy. Advantages of monitoring pore pressure at two different locations on the piezoball are argued.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePenetrometer Testing: Effect of Partial Consolidation on Subsequent Dissipation Response
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume140
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001114
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian